Learners will manage an obstetrical complication of dystocia in the second stage of labour.
Your shift has just started as the physician on call for labour and delivery at a rural 1A maternity site (no local cesarean section capabilities), with the nearest urban centre 500km away. The physician giving you report indicates there is one patient, Nel Dumas, currently in labour, who you will be caring for.
Nel is a 28 y/o non-binary person who presented to the emergency department 5 hours ago with a 7-hour history of labour pain, increasing in frequency and duration. They are at 38+6 weeks gestational age. At the time of presentation, they were 5 cm dilated and having strong contractions every 4-5 minutes, lasting for 60 seconds. This is their first pregnancy which has been complicated by gestational diabetes. Nel has been receiving regular antenatal care, and the fetus has consistently been measuring above the 95th percentile at their ultrasounds. Due to their diagnosis of gestational diabetes, it was strongly recommended that Nel deliver at a tertiary centre, however they decided to stay local because they take care of their mother at home and did not want to be away from her unless it was completely necessary. Nel was last assessed approximately an hour ago.
On examination, the patient will be dilated to 10 cm. The learner will manage dystocia in the second stage by determining the cause of dystocia, performing manual rotation of the fetus, assessing options and risks, and ultimately transporting the patient out to the nearest major medical centre for an operative delivery.
This simulation is part of ØRECLESS (Rural Emergencies and Complications in Labour Events Simulations Suite).
Overall Goal: Safely manage an obstetrical complication of a prolonged second stage of labour and practice decision-making in transporting the patient to a larger medical centre.
Specific Learning Objectives:
Time Recommended: 60 minutes total (10 min Setup | 20 min Scenario | 30 min Debrief)
Patient Recommendation: Standardized Patient + OB Mannequin + OB Trainer
Medical Equipment:
Medications:
Other:
|
This SIM requires one learner. Supporting roles can (1) be assigned to complete tasks by the learner, (2) provide assistance with maneuvers, and (3) provide statements throughout the SIM to allow for progression through the stages.
|
Moulage: Set up with the fetus in cephalic presentation, left occiput posterior position, and fetal station of 0.
Set-Up: The patient is lying in a semirecumbent position breathing through contractions. They appear to be tired and uncomfortable.
Note: While prepping for your simulation, don't forget to prep for the debrief. Become comfortable with your chosen framework, review your objectives. For additional debriefing resources, see our Resources page.
Original Author: Kristen Palumbo
Originally published on: January 2, 2024
Most Recent Modification:
A good prebriefing is an essential component of running effective simulations, as it sets the stage for everything that comes after it1-3. An effective prebrief will create a safe container for learning, and in doing so, help participants feel more comfortable pushing their limits, sharing their thoughts and feelings, and buying into the experience. In turn, this will enhance engagement, participation, and learning. To that end, the prebriefing process needs to cover a lot of information1-5, which can make it daunting to novice or non-expert facilitators. To help, we have consulted the relevant literature and put together a prebrief guide to ensure that you have the tools you need to run an effective pre-briefing session.
Throughout the pre-brief, it is important that you convey your commitment to respecting learners and their perspective2-4, and establish and maintain the simulation as a safe space for learning1,4,5.
Prebrief Guide (Sample Phrases in Italics)
Welcome learners. Introduce yourself, your role, and your experience with simulation.
Go over the time requirements for the simulation, when breaks will occur, how learners should handle incoming calls or texts, etc.
Clarify the learning objectives for the simulation1-5. Give information on the purpose of the simulation without giving out specific actions or information that might compromise the learning experience for participants.
Explain how participants will be evaluated (formative/summative/not evaluated). Briefly discuss the debrief process that will take place at the end of the simulation.
Give details on what expectations are for the learners' behaviour during the simulation, setting basic ground rules2-5. Go over expectations for yourself as the facilitator. Reinforce the simulation as a learning environment, where mistakes aren't something to be punished but opportunities for further learning.
This could be a good place to pause and ask learners if they have any additional expectations, fears, comments, or questions about the topic for the day.
Ensure all participants agree to the confidentiality expectations of the simulation. Often, this will follow the mantra of "What happens in the simulation stays in the simulation," where learners and instructors agree not to share information on others' performance or scenario details outside of the simulation environment.
Explain that you've done what you can to make the simulation as real as possible, but acknowledge the limitations. Ask the learner to commit to doing what they can to act as if everything was real, explaining that the quality of their learning will depend on their willingness to participate as fully as possible. For the first simulation with a new group, it could be helpful to explain the importance of a mutual fiction contract.
Explain the different roles in the simulation and assign learners to them. If you have predetermined scripts for certain roles, hand them out here.
Explain the resources that will be available for the participants to use, how they should call for help in the simulation, what your role will be in providing information.
Orient participants to simulation space, equipment, manikin, etc. This can also be done by allowing participants to explore the simulation space and manikin for themselves.
Ask for questions!
References
1. Rudolph JW, Raemer DB, Simon R. Establishing a safe container for learning in simulation: the role of the presimulation briefing. Simul Healthc. 2014 Dec;9(6):339-49. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000047. PMID: 25188485.
2. Leigh G, Steuben F. Setting Learners up for Success: Presimulation and Prebriefing Strategies. Teaching and Learning in Nursing. 2018; 13(3):185-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2018.03.004
3. Lecomte F, Jaffrelot M. Chapter 33 - Prebriefing and Briefing. Clinical Simulation. 2019; 2nd ed.; 471-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815657-5.00034-6.
4. INACSL Standards Committee (2016, December). INACSL standards of best practice: SimulationSM Facilitation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12(S), S16-S20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.007.
5. Simon R, Raemer D, Rudolph J. Rater's handbook for the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH) Rater Version. 2009. http://www.harvardmedsim.org/debriefing-assesment-simulation-healthcare.php.
Your shift has just started as the physician on call for labour and delivery at a rural 1A maternity site (no local cesarean section capabilities), with the nearest urban centre 500km away. The physician giving you report indicates there is one patient, Nel Dumas, currently in labour, who you will be caring for.
Nel is a 28 y/o non-binary person who presented to the emergency department 5 hours ago with a 7 hour history of labour pain, increasing in frequency and duration. They are at 38+6 weeks gestational age. At the time of presentation, they were 5 cm dilated and having strong contractions every 4-5 minutes, lasting for 60 seconds. This is their first pregnancy which has been complicated by gestational diabetes. Nel has been receiving regular antenatal care, and the fetus has consistently been measuring above the 95th percentile at their ultrasounds. Due to their diagnosis of gestational diabetes, it was strongly recommended that Nel deliver at a tertiary centre, however they decided to stay local because they take care of their mother at home and did not want to be away from her unless it was completely necessary. Nel was last assessed approximately an hour ago.
|
Patient Chart |
||||||||||
|
Name: Nel Dumas |
Age: 28 |
Gender: Non-binary |
Weight: 79 kg |
Height: 152 cm |
GA: 38+6 Weeks |
|||||
|
Temp: 36.9 |
HR: 90 bpm |
BP: 121/79 |
RR: 16/min |
O2Sat: 100% |
GCS: 15 |
|||||
| Presenting complaint: Abdominal pain and tightening. | ||||||||||
Nel, a 28 y/o non-binary person presented to the ED 5 hours ago, dilated to 5 cm. At their previous check an hour ago they were 9 cm dilated and completely effaced. Assess the patient and the fetus.
Modifiers (in red): Actions by the learner (which will have a consequence) OR actions to prompt learner. Extra information, audio clips, etc. are provided below.
| Patient Vitals | ||||
| BP: 121/79 | HR (Rhythm): 90 bpm (Normal Sinus) | RR: 16/min. | ||
| O2SAT: 100% | Temperature: 36.9 degrees Celsius | GCS: 15 | ||
| Expected Learner Actions |
|---|
|
Call nursing/staff to increase available team numbers |
| 8 min. OR Actions Complete ⇒ 2. Preparation |
Pronouns: They/them
Pregnancy Records: G1P0, Rh+, Fetus size consistently measuring above the 95th percentile, estimated fetal weight = 4100g
Gestation: 38+6
Membrane: Ruptured, clear fluid
No. previous deliveries: Nulliparous
Pregnancy Complications: Gestational Diabetes (since week 28)
Medication(s): Insulin Detemir at bedtime.
Other: No Allergies. Family history of diabetes. Past medical history is unremarkable.
Baseline FHR: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IsvFu9LUJsunslNI1RMnCC1xgUCzOXdo/view?usp=sharing
Post-Contraction: https://drive.google.com/file/d/124sVIYykuXW6yeIIWiRnCu1-xiPuskQE/view?usp=sharing
FHR = 116 bpm (Normal Range = 120 - 160 bpm)
Rhythm: Regular
Accelerations present.
General Abdominal Exam: No visible asymmetry, lesions, or scars. No appreciable masses, swelling, rigidity, or guarding. Patient is full-term.
Leopold Maneuvers:
Fundal Grip: Palpable soft, irregular mass.
Lateral Grip: Fetal back is on the left side and the limbs are felt on the right.
Pelvic Grip: Head is palpable.
Fetal Lie: Longitudinal
Fetal Presentation: Cephalic
Position: Left Occiput Posterior (LOP)
Uterine Activity Characteristics:
Frequency: Every 90 sec. (~3-5 contractions/ 10 minutes)
Duration: 60 sec.
Intensity: Strong
Resting tone: Soft between contractions
Dilation: 10cm
Fetal Station: 0
Effacement: 100%
Membrane: Absent
Caput: None
Moulding: +2
The patient is 10 cm dilated and feeling some pressure. The fetus is presenting in the left occiput posterior (LOP) position. Prepare for delivery by collecting the necessary equipment and discuss the management plan with Nel.
Modifiers (in red): Actions by the learner (which will have a consequence) OR actions to prompt learner. Extra information, audio clips, etc. are provided below.
| Expected Learner Actions |
|---|
|
Call nursing/staff to increase available team numbers Administer analgesic (Fentanyl, 25-50mcg IV, Onset: 1-3 min, Duration: 30-60 min) |
| 3 min. OR Actions Complete ⇒ 3. Manual Rotation |
Preparation for delivery has been completed. The patient has been pushing for one hour and there has been no further descent, despite adequate pushing. Continue to monitor FHR, reassess uterine characteristics and fetal orientation, and perform relevant maneuvers.
Modifiers (in red): Actions by the learner (which will have a consequence) OR actions to prompt learner. Extra information, audio clips, etc. are provided below.
| Expected Learner Actions |
|---|
|
Assess and palpate for contractions Manual rotation from occiput posterior (OP) to occiput anterior (OA) |
| 5 min. OR Actions Complete ⇒ 4. Organize Transportation |
Baseline FHR: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pEZVWTVycM0vhyy61_9Sq3fyGVje_4aR/view?usp=sharing
Post-Contraction: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pEZVWTVycM0vhyy61_9Sq3fyGVje_4aR/view?usp=sharing
FHR = 130 bpm (Normal Range = 120 - 160 bpm)
Rhythm: Regular
Accelerations and decelerations are not present.
Dilation: 6cm
Fetal Station: 0
Effacement: 80%
Membrane: Absent
Overt umbilical cord prolapse and the presence of pulsations within the cord vessels.
Park, M., Jung, Y.W., Park, J. et al. Successful delayed delivery of the second twin by evacuating the cord prolapsed first fetus and emergent cerclage: a report of 2 cases.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 22, 113 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04438-z
Manual rotation from fetal malposition to an occiput anterior position was unsuccessful. Fetal station has not progressed. Given that the fetal head is not fully engaged, continues to present in OP position, and is estimated to be greater than 4000g, assisted vaginal delivery will likely not be safe. Spontaneous delivery may still be possible, and intermittent auscultation is not indicative of concern. Prepare for transportation to a tertiary medical centre in the event that labour becomes arrested and Cesarean Section is required.
Modifiers (in red): Actions by the learner (which will have a consequence) OR actions to prompt learner. Extra information, audio clips, etc. are provided below.
| Expected Learner Actions |
|---|
|
Inform patient of the situation and management plan |
| 4 min. OR Actions Complete ⇒ 5. Case Complete |
Nel has been pushing for over 2 hours with little to no further descent of the fetal head. The second stage of labour is considered prolonged in a nulliparous patient after 3 hours of adequate pushing. As Nel is approaching the diagnostic time for a prolonged second stage, and further progress is unlikely, Cesarean Section is indicated. The Air Ambulance arrived 30 minutes ago. The patient agreed to this course of action and will be safely transported to a major medical centre to deliver their baby. A social worker has been called and found a caregiver for Nel’s mother while they are away, which Nel felt comfortable with and agreed to. The case is complete.
|
Date and Time |
|
|---|---|
|
ID
|
CC
|
|
HPI: 4 Key Questions
|
Hx of Pregnancy
|
|
OBHx: Outcomes of previous pregnancies
|
|
|
PMHx
|
|
|
On Examination (O/E)
|
|
|
GxPx |
GTPAL |
|
G = Gravidity → total # of pregnancies |
G = Gravidity → total # of pregnancies
L = number of living children |
E.g., Patient has been pregnant 4 times. The first one ended in a miscarriage at 10 weeks, the second child was born healthy at 38 weeks, the third was carried to 23 weeks but was born stillborn and she is currently 35 weeks gestation with the fourth pregnancy.
This can be described as: G4P2 in GxPx format or G4T1P1A1L1 in the GTPAL format.
Leopold Maneuvers: Systematic abdominal palpation maneuvers performed after 30-32 weeks gestation. They are used to determine the presentation, position, and engagement of the fetus in utero.
Fetal Orientation:
|
1. Fetal Lie: Relation of fetal long axis to long maternal uterus |
|
|
|
|
2. Presentation: The part of the fetus that overlies pelvic inlet (separation between abdominal & pelvic organs - borders include sacral promontory & pubic symphysis) |
|
|
Cephalic (head down in pelvic inlet) - most common Compound (more than one part presenting - e.g., cephalic or breech + extremity |
|
|
3. Fetal Position: Relationship to maternal pelvis |
|
|
Occiput Anterior (OA) - fetal occiput (posterior head) towards pubic symphysis (face down) |
|
|
4. Fetal Attitude: How much the fetal head flexes/extends during cephalic presentation |
|
|
Vertex - maximum flexion (most common) *spontaneous vaginal delivery possible in all attitudes |
|
|
5. Fetal Station: Measurement (in cm) of where the presenting part of the fetus is located in the pelvis, in relation to ischial spine |
|
|
Negative (-) = above ischial spine  |
|
|
6. Synclitism: Parallelism between pelvic plane and plane of fetal head |
|
|
Synclitism - posture in which the 2 parietal bones are at the same level  |
Retrieved July 2, 2023 from: https://www.parents.com/pregnancy/giving-birth/labor-and-delivery/cervix-dilation-chart-pictures-that-explain-the-stages-of-labor/
Retrieved July 27, 2023 from: https://www.instagram.com/p/CHJCbAhgdIu/?utm_source=ig_web_button_share_sheet
Retrieved July 27, 2023 from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x17vY7_3M2M
Adapted September 12, 2023 from https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/326380
|
First Stage |
|
|
Latent Phase Duration: Nulliparous: <20h Multiparous: <14h Clinical Features: Contractions:
Changes in Dilation:
|
Active Phase Duration: Nulliparous: 4-6h Multiparous: 2-3h Clinical Features: Contractions:
Changes in Dilation:
|
|
Clinical Features (Latent & Active Phases):
Overview of Physician Role:
|
|
|
Second Stage |
|
|
Duration: Nulliparous: <2h (3 with epidural) Multiparous: <1h (2 w/ epidural) Clinical Features:
Overview of Physician Role:
|
|
|
Third Stage |
|
|
Duration: 30 minutes Clinical Features:
Overview of Physician Role:
|
|
|
Fourth Stage |
|
|
1-2 hour postpartum period Clinical Features:
Overview of Physician Role:
|
|
|
Assessing Contraction Pattern |
|||||||||||
|
Methods of Assessment |
|||||||||||
|
Palpation by Hand
|
Tocodynamometer (external)
|
Internal Intrauterine Pressure Catheter (IUPC)
|
|||||||||
|
Characteristics of Contractions |
|||||||||||
|
Frequency |
Duration |
Intensity |
Resting Tone |
||||||||
|
# of contractions in 10 minutes, averaged over 30 minutes Normal: ≤ 5 in 10 mins |
# of seconds from beginning to end of contraction Normal: <90 s |
Strength of contraction By palpation if using tocodynamometer: mild, moderate, or strong (strong = uterus cannot be indented) Normal (IUPC): 25-75 mmHg above baseline |
Firmness between contractions Palpation: soft or firm Normal (palpation): soft between contractions for at least 30s to allow for placental perfusion Normal (IUPC): 7-25 mmHg |
||||||||
|
Abnormal Contraction Pattern |
|||||||||||
|
Tachysystole - excessive uterine activity (commonly d/t exogenous augmentation by oxytocin or other uterotonic agent) Characteristics: >5 contractions per 10-min period averaged over 30 mins and/or Impact: Can reduce placental perfusion & result in fetal hypoxemia |
|||||||||||
Important Notes Regarding Pharmacological use in Labour:
Options for Pharmacological Pain Management in Labour (see dosing information below):
Suggested Opioid use in labour:
|
Stage of Labour |
Nulliparous |
Parous |
|
Latent Stage: |
IM/SC Morphine |
IM/SC Morphine |
|
Early Active Stage: |
IM/SC or IV Morphine |
IV Morphine or Fentanyl |
|
Late Active Stage: |
IV Morphine or Fentanyl |
IV Fentanyl |
|
Second Stage: |
IV Fentanyl |
IV Fentanyl |
Reference(s):
Grant G. (2022). Pharmacologic management of pain during labor and delivery. In Crowley M (Ed.), UpToDate. Retrieved Jul 2, 2023, from https://www.uptodate.com/contents/pharmacologic-management-of-pain-during-labor-and-delivery
Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada. ALARM Manual, 28th Ed. 2022.
Reference(s):
Argani, A. H., & Satin, A. J. (2022). Occiput Posteror Position. In Barss V (Ed.), UpToDate. Retrieved Aug 20, 2023, from https://www.uptodate.com/contents/occiput-posterior-position?search=occiput%20posterior%20position&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~13&usage_type=default&display_rank=1#references
Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada. ALARM Manual, 28th Ed. 2022.
Choosing a Debrief Framework:
A good debrief has been identified in the literature as the most important part of a successful simulation experience. If you're a novice or inexperienced facilitator, use this table to help you choose which debrief framework you want to use, just tap the button on their name and you will be directed to the appropriate aids or scripts. While we recommend the PEARLS framework, take a look to see if there may be another that is a better fit for your situation.
|
|
|||||
|
Time |
Facilitator Level |
Prep Time |
Scenario Type |
Flexibility |
|
|
Moderate |
Novice |
Moderate |
Any |
High |
|
|
Short-Moderate |
Novice |
Low |
Short w/ Clear Objectives |
Low |
|
|
Moderate |
Novice |
Moderate |
Any, esp. Team-focused |
Moderate |
|
|
Very Short |
No experience |
None |
Any |
Low |
|
|
Short |
Novice |
Low |
Low number of non-technical skills |
Low |
|
|
Very Short |
No experience |
None |
Any |
Moderate |
|
|
Moderate-Long |
Novice |
Moderate |
Any |
Moderate |
(To learn more about this debriefing framework, visit our page on Debriefing resources)
If you need help with debriefing Crisis Resource Management skills, check out this infographic from Isaak & Stiegler: View Infographic
|
Phase |
Objective |
Task |
Sample Phrases |
||
|
1. Setting the Scene |
Create a safe context for learning |
State the goal of debriefing; articulate the basic assumption |
“Let’s spend X minutes debriefing. Our goal is to improve how we work together and care for our patients.” “Everyone here is intelligent and wants to improve”
|
||
|
2. Reactions |
Explore feelings |
Solicit initial reactions and emotions
|
“Any initial reactions?” “How are you feeling?” |
||
|
3. Description |
Clarify Facts |
Develop a shared understanding of the case |
“Can you please share a short summary of the case?” “What was the working diagnosis? Does everyone agree?”
|
||
|
4. Analysis |
Explore a variety of performance domains:
|
See bottom of guide for details on the analysis phase |
For each item to be debriefed: 1. Preview Statement: (to introduce topic)
2. Pick Analysis method + Analyze: (see below for more info on each method)
3. Mini Summary: (to summarize discussion of topic)
Phase Wrap-up: "Any outstanding issues or concerns before we start to close?" |
||
|
5. Application or Summary |
Identify take-aways |
Can be learner- or instructor-centered |
Learner-centered: “What are some takeaways from this discussion for our clinical practice?”
Instructor-centered: “The key learning points for the case were [insert learning points]”
|
||
|
Analysis Phase Details |
|||||
|
Choose an analysis approach (Different approaches can be used for different topics within the same analysis stage): |
|||||
|
Approach |
Objective |
Sample Phrases |
|||
|
Learner Self-Assessment
|
Promote reflection by asking learners to assess their own performance |
“What aspects were managed well and why?”
“What aspects do you want to change and why?”
|
|||
|
Focused Facilitation
|
Probe deeper on key aspects of performance, uncover mental frames guiding performance |
Use Advocacy-Inquiry Method Advocacy: "I saw [observation], I think [your point-of-view]” "I noticed [observation] I liked that/I was concerned..." Inquiry: “How do you see it? What were your thoughts at the time?” |
|||
|
Provide Information
|
Teach to close clear knowledge gaps as they emerge and provide directive feedback as needed |
“I noticed[behaviour]. Next time you may want to consider [suggested behaviour], because [rationale]” |
|||
PDF from debrief2learn.org: Here
Visual Guide: debrief2learn.org
Alternative Script: Here
Originally Created by: Bajaj K, Meguerdichian M, Thoma B, Huang S, Eppich W, Cheng A. The PEARLS Healthcare Debriefing Tool. Acad Med. 2018, 93(2), 336.
(To learn more about this debriefing framework, visit our page on Debriefing resources)
If you need help with debriefing Crisis Resource Management skills, check out this infographic from Isaak & Stiegler: View Infographic
|
Phase |
Goal |
Actions |
Possible Scripts |
|
Gather (Listen)
25% |
|
|
How do you feel? |
|
How do you think it went? Can you tell me what happened? |
||
|
Can anyone add anything to that account? |
||
|
Analyze (Guide Reflection)
50% |
|
|
I noticed… |
|
I noticed…. What was the thought process behind…. When….happened, I saw….What do you think….. I saw…I think….How do you see it? |
||
|
Tell me more about… How did you feel about…. I understand, but tell me about X aspect of the scenario |
||
|
Summarize (Help gather Conclusions)
25%
|
|
|
What are two things that you thought were effective or went well? |
|
What do you think are some areas you/your team need to work on? |
||
|
In today’s session, we…. Going forward, we should…. |
References/Adapted From:
(To learn more about this debriefing framework, visit our page on Debriefing resources)
If you need help with debriefing Crisis Resource Management skills, check out this infographic from Isaak & Stiegler: View Infographic
Instructions:
|
Actions |
Gather |
Analyze |
Summarize |
|
Closed-loop communication
Clear Messages
Clear Roles
Knowing one’s limitations
Knowledge Sharing
Constructive Intervention
Reevaluation and Summarizing
Mutual Respect
|
Student Observations
Instructor Observations
|
Done Well
Needs Improvement
|
Student-led Summary
Instructor-led Summary
|
References/Adapted from:
(To learn more about this debriefing framework, visit our page on Debriefing resources)
If you need help with debriefing Crisis Resource Management skills, check out this infographic from Isaak & Stiegler: View Infographic
|
|
Set learning objectives |
|
After Case |
How did it go? Address Concerns Review learning points Plan ahead |
Framework from:
(To learn more about this debriefing framework, visit our page on Debriefing resources)
If you need help with debriefing Crisis Resource Management skills, check out this infographic from Isaak & Stiegler: View Infographic
|
Diamond Debrief: Sample Phrases |
|
Description |
|
“So what happened?...and then what happened next?”
Continue asking until confident that the details of the scenario have been raised by the learners
“Let’s not judge our performance now, let’s just focus on what happened” |
|
Transition |
|
“This scenario was designed to show…”
“Let’s address technical and clinical questions. What is the protocol for…?”
“How do we normally deal with this clinical situation?”
“Everyone ok with that?” |
|
Analysis |
|
“How did that make you feel?” To participants, then group “Why?” Then use silence
“How did you/they do that exactly?” “Why did you respond in that way? “ or “Why did you take that action?”
“It feels like…was an issue. Did it feel like that to you?” What I’m hearing from you is…is that correct?”
“This is part of…” (identify the non-technical skill/human factor) “We refer to that as a human factor or non-technical skill, which means…” |
|
Transition |
|
“So, what we’ve talked about in this scenario is…” “What have we agreed we could do?” |
|
Application |
|
“What other kinds of situations might you face that might be similar? How are they similar?”
“How might these skills we discussed play out in those situations?”
“What are you going to do differently in your practice going forward?” |
|
Underlying Principles |
|
Description |
|
Reinforce a safe learning environment. Situate the debrief in the shared and meaningful activity that occurred. Keep the focus dispassionate—discuss what happened but avoid focus on emotions. Listen for emotional responses but resist the temptation to discuss emotions. Make sure everyone shares the same understanding of what happened.
|
|
Transition |
|
Transition into analysis by clarifying any technical and clinical issues |
|
Analysis |
|
Spend most of your time in Analysis. Deconstruct behaviours into specific actions, and explore what happened in detail. Ask about affective responses and validate them. Analyze and interpret the activity by applying appropriate frameworks or lenses (such as non-technical skills, or the clinical context surrounding the scenario). Keep discussion positive, and avoid the temptation to focus on “strengths and weaknesses”. Reflect responses back, allowing participants to amend or augment. |
|
Transition |
|
Transition into Application by reinforcing learning. |
|
Application |
|
Focus on moving from the specifics of the scenario to the more general world of practice. Break behaviours down into specific actions. Explore the other kinds of situations that these might apply to. Ask what participants will do differently in their practice. |
Adapted From: Jaye P, Thomas L, Reedy G (2015). 'The Diamond': a structure for simulation debrief. The Clinical Teacher 12(1). 171-175. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/tct.12300
If you need help with debriefing Crisis Resource Management skills, check out this infographic from Isaak & Stiegler: View Infographic
Pluses:
Deltas:
|
Plus (+) |
Delta (∆) |
References:
((To learn more about this debriefing framework, visit our page on Debriefing resources)
If you need help with debriefing Crisis Resource Management skills, check out this infographic from Isaak & Stiegler: View Infographic
|
Phase |
Purpose |
Process |
Sample Phrases |
|
Reactions |
|
|
How are you feeling? What are some initial reactions to what just happened? So, in that scenario… |
|
Analysis |
|
1. Observe an event or result. Comment on the observation.
2. Advocate for your position |
I saw that… I think… I noticed that…To me…
I saw…I’m concerned that… |
|
3. Investigate basis for learner’s thinking that led to the observed event or result |
What do you think? Why do you think that happened? How do you see it? What was the thought process behind….? |
||
|
4. Close the gap through discussion and didactics |
I hear…. What would it take for you to do this next time? How could we do this differently next time? I think a few good ideas that came up were… I’d like to say a little bit about…from my experience/literature |
||
|
Summary |
|
|
What are some takeaways from today? What went well today? What would you do differently next time?
In today’s session, we…. Going forward, we should… |
Adapted from:
Assessment:
Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring:
Other:
