89 y/o presents with severe sepsis, and critical care may be inappropriate. Learners will engage in a goals of care discussion with family member, which will include planning for end of life care.
An 89-year-old patient is brought into emerge by ambulance from their nursing home. Staff found her unresponsive and hypotensive at morning handover. Learners should identify severe sepsis and realize that critical care interventions may be inappropriate. One of the patient's family members will arrive. This should prompt a goals of care discussion, including the potential for initiating end-of-life care.
Overall Goal: To practice goals of care planning in elderly patients with whom further life-saving interventions may not be beneficial, and to demonstrate compassionate and informative communication with caregivers.
Specific Learning Objectives:
Time Recommended: 50 minutes total (10 min Setup | 20 min Scenario | 20 min Debrief)
Patient Recommendation: Standardized patient actor or low-fidelity manikin
Medical Equipment:
Medications:
Role | Description (Role, Behaviour, Key Moments, Script) |
Patient |
You are essentially moribund for this scenario. You have very cool peripheries (as demonstrated with ice) and look grey and ashen. Your mouth is wide open and your eyes are staring into space. You are breathing comfortably with an occasional mild cough. You may be provided with oxygen, and/or IV fluids started. They may put your legs up and tilt the head of the bed down. |
Patient's Granddaughter |
Background: You received a call from the home that your grandmother was very unwell and had been taken to hospital. You have power of attorney, and kind of knew this day would come as it’s been a rocky past 6 months with her. She has been going downhill fast at the nursing home and no longer recognizes any of the family. She is intermittently aggressive and for the last week she hasn’t been eating or drinking anything. No one has ever brought up her end-of-life wishes with you before, but in the back of your mind you did realize that she might die soon. The GP said she had a urinary tract infection when he visited a couple of days ago and seemed to think that this is the reason she was off her food and prescribed some antibiotics. Stage 2: Participants will be undertaking an initial assessment recognizing the severity of the patient’s condition. They will seek information from you, notes and other sources to determine cause and likely prognosis. Ideally, they will quickly engage in a discussion regarding the patients end of life wishes.
|
ED RN |
Act as a normal ED RN, providing initial handover and assisting with bedside care of the patient. Stage 2:
|
Moulage: Manikin/Patient should be grey and ashen with cool peripheries (may simulate with cool pack or ice). A cannula is in situ, having been placed by the paramedics.
Set-Up: Set up patient in an emerge room as though they had just been brought in by EMS services. Ensure IV access.
Note: While prepping for your simulation, don't forget to prep for the debrief. Become comfortable with your chosen framework, review your objectives. For additional debriefing resources, see our Resources page.
Credits:
Original Authors: Prof. Victoria Brazil, Dr. Nemat Alsaba, Dr. Rebecca Shaw
Date: 2018
Originally published on: EM Sim Cases
Most Recent Modification: July 2021
Modified by: Mateo Orrantia
A good prebriefing is an essential component of running effective simulations, as it sets the stage for everything that comes after it1-3. An effective prebrief will create a safe container for learning, and in doing so, help participants feel more comfortable pushing their limits, sharing their thoughts and feelings, and buying into the experience. In turn, this will enhance engagement, participation, and learning. To that end, the prebriefing process needs to cover a lot of information1-5, which can make it daunting to novice or non-expert facilitators. To help, we have consulted the relevant literature and put together a prebrief guide to ensure that you have the tools you need to run an effective pre-briefing session.
Throughout the pre-brief, it is important that you convey your commitment to respecting learners and their perspective2-4, and establish and maintain the simulation as a safe space for learning1,4,5.
Prebrief Guide (Sample Phrases in Italics)
Welcome learners. Introduce yourself, your role, and your experience with simulation.
Go over the time requirements for the simulation, when breaks will occur, how learners should handle incoming calls or texts, etc.
Clarify the learning objectives for the simulation1-5. Give information on the purpose of the simulation without giving out specific actions or information that might compromise the learning experience for participants.
Explain how participants will be evaluated (formative/summative/not evaluated). Briefly discuss the debrief process that will take place at the end of the simulation.
Give details on what expectations are for the learners' behaviour during the simulation, setting basic ground rules2-5. Go over expectations for yourself as the facilitator. Reinforce the simulation as a learning environment, where mistakes aren't something to be punished but opportunities for further learning.
This could be a good place to pause and ask learners if they have any additional expectations, fears, comments, or questions about the topic for the day.
Ensure all participants agree to the confidentiality expectations of the simulation. Often, this will follow the mantra of "What happens in the simulation stays in the simulation," where learners and instructors agree not to share information on others' performance or scenario details outside of the simulation environment.
Explain that you've done what you can to make the simulation as real as possible, but acknowledge the limitations. Ask the learner to commit to doing what they can to act as if everything was real, explaining that the quality of their learning will depend on their willingness to participate as fully as possible. For the first simulation with a new group, it could be helpful to explain the importance of a mutual fiction contract.
Explain the different roles in the simulation and assign learners to them. If you have predetermined scripts for certain roles, hand them out here.
Explain the resources that will be available for the participants to use, how they should call for help in the simulation, what your role will be in providing information.
Orient participants to simulation space, equipment, manikin, etc. This can also be done by allowing participants to explore the simulation space and manikin for themselves.
Ask for questions!
References
1. Rudolph JW, Raemer DB, Simon R. Establishing a safe container for learning in simulation: the role of the presimulation briefing. Simul Healthc. 2014 Dec;9(6):339-49. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000047. PMID: 25188485.
2. Leigh G, Steuben F. Setting Learners up for Success: Presimulation and Prebriefing Strategies. Teaching and Learning in Nursing. 2018; 13(3):185-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2018.03.004
3. Lecomte F, Jaffrelot M. Chapter 33 - Prebriefing and Briefing. Clinical Simulation. 2019; 2nd ed.; 471-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815657-5.00034-6.
4. INACSL Standards Committee (2016, December). INACSL standards of best practice: SimulationSM Facilitation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12(S), S16-S20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.007.
5. Simon R, Raemer D, Rudolph J. Rater's handbook for the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH) Rater Version. 2009. http://www.harvardmedsim.org/debriefing-assesment-simulation-healthcare.php.
The charge nurse informs you: The charge nurse informs you “I just put a very unwell looking patient into resus. She’s from a nursing home facility and the paramedics think she is septic. She’s hypotensive and barely responsive. Honestly, she looks like she might be dying. Her granddaughter is on her way. I don’t think she has a known advanced care directive or code status.”
Patient Chart |
|||||||||
Patient Name: Sandra Thompson |
Age: 89 |
Gender: F |
Weight: 55kg |
||||||
Presenting complaint: Found unresponsive and hypotensive at nursing home morning rounds |
|||||||||
Temp: 35.1oC |
HR: 90 |
BP: 62/40 |
RR: 28 |
O2Sat: 86% RA |
FiO2: |
||||
Cap glucose: 2.1mmol/L |
GCS: 12 (E4 V2 M6) |
||||||||
Triage Note: Unresponsive and hypotensive at nursing home. Previously treated |
|||||||||
Allergies: NKDA |
|||||||||
Past Medical History: Hypertension |
Current Medications: Acetaminophen |
Further History: In nursing home facility. Was admitted there 6 months ago after prolonged admission to hospital w/ delirium and sepsis, on a background of progressive cognitive decline. No further history available from patient.
Physical Exam | |
Cardio: Normal heart sounds. Wide complex rhythm on ECG. | Neuro: Lethargic and moaning. PEARL 3mm |
Resp.: Shallow respirations w/ decreased entry to the right base with inspiratory crackles | Head & Neck: Nil |
Abdo: Soft and non-tender. BS present | MSK/Skin: Nil |
Other: Nil |
The charge nurse informs you: The charge nurse informs you “I just put a very unwell looking patient into resus. She’s from a nursing home facility and the paramedics think she is septic. She’s hypotensive and barely responsive. Honestly, she looks like she might be dying. Her granddaughter is on her way. I don’t think she has a known advanced care directive or code status.”
Patient Chart |
|||||||||
Patient Name: Sandra Thompson |
Age: 89 |
Gender: F |
Weight: 55kg |
||||||
Presenting complaint: Found unresponsive and hypotensive at nursing home morning rounds |
|||||||||
Temp: 35.1oC |
HR: 90 |
BP: 62/40 |
RR: 28 |
O2Sat: 86% RA |
FiO2: |
||||
Cap glucose: 2.1mmol/L |
GCS: 12 (E4 V2 M6) |
||||||||
Triage Note: Unresponsive and hypotensive at nursing home. Previously treated |
|||||||||
Allergies: NKDA |
|||||||||
Past Medical History: Hypertension |
Current Medications: Acetaminophen |
Patient is drowsy and moaning, with cool peripheries.
Patient State/Vitals | ||||||
Rhythm: Sinus, broad complex | HR: 90 | BP: 62/40 | RR: 28 | |||
O2SAT: 86% | T: 35.1oC | GCS: 12 |
Expected Learner Actions | Modifiers | Triggers |
---|---|---|
Collateral history and examinations |
O2 applied ⇒ O2SAT 89% Dextrose ⇒ Gluc. 8.2 |
All actions complete ⇒ ED RN prompts that relative has arrived ⇒ 2. Worsening Hemodynamics 5 minutes ⇒ ED RN prompts that relative has arrived ⇒ 2. Worsening Hemodynamics |
Further History: In nursing home facility. Was admitted there 6 months ago after prolonged admission to hospital w/ delirium and sepsis, on a background of progressive cognitive decline. No further history available from patient.
Physical Exam | |
Cardio: Normal heart sounds. Wide complex rhythm on ECG. | Neuro: Lethargic and moaning. PEARL 3mm |
Resp.: Shallow respirations w/ decreased entry to the right base with inspiratory crackles | Head & Neck: Nil |
Abdo: Soft and non-tender. BS present | MSK/Skin: Nil |
Other: Nil |
These lab results show a myriad of different issues, with little to indicate one single issue in particular. Sepsis in conjunction with other issues is indicated by these reports.
Sandra Thompson | |||||
MRN: 1234-567-890 | Age: 89 | ||||
Complete Blood Count | |||||
WBC | 15.1 | x109L | H | ||
Hgb | 120 | g/L | L | ||
Plt | 150 | x109L | |||
Electrolytes | |||||
Na | 129 | mmol/L | L | ||
K | 7.8 | mmol/L | H | ||
HCO3 | 13 | mmol/L | L | ||
Cl | 104 | mmol/L | |||
Urea | 15.3 | mmol/L | H | ||
Cr | 259 | µmol/L | H | ||
Glucose | 2.2 | mmol/L | L | ||
Venous Blood Gas | |||||
pH | 7.1 | L | |||
pCO2 | 61 | mmHg | H | ||
PO2 | 70 | mmHg | H | ||
HCO3 | 13 | mmol/L | L | ||
Lactate | 9 | mmol/L | H |
Sandra Thompson | |||||
MRN: 1234-567-890 | Age: 89 | ||||
Complete Blood Count | |||||
WBC | 15.1 | x109L | H | ||
Hgb | 120 | g/L | L | ||
Plt | 150 | x109L | |||
Electrolytes | |||||
Na | 129 | mmol/L | L | ||
K | 7.8 | mmol/L | H | ||
HCO3 | 13 | mmol/L | L | ||
Cl | 104 | mmol/L | |||
Urea | 15.3 | mmol/L | H | ||
Cr | 259 | µmol/L | H | ||
Glucose | 2.2 | mmol/L | L | ||
Venous Blood Gas | |||||
pH | 7.1 | L | |||
pCO2 | 61 | mmHg | H | ||
PO2 | 70 | mmHg | H | ||
HCO3 | 13 | mmol/L | L | ||
Lactate | 9 | mmol/L | H |
Patient State/Vitals | ||||||
Rhythm: Sinus, broad complex | HR: 90 | BP: 62/40 | RR: 28 | |||
O2SAT: 86% | T: 35.1oC | GCS: 12 |
Patient in similar state to previous, but slowly declining.
Patient State/Vitals | ||||||
Rhythm: Sinus, wide complex | HR: 72 (↓) | BP: 60/40 (↓) | RR: 10 (↓) | |||
O2SAT: 82% (↓) | T: 35.1oC | GCS: 12 |
Expected Learner Actions | Modifiers | Triggers |
---|---|---|
End of life discussion with family member/ |
No Modifiers for this Stage |
Adequate discussion with family member completed ⇒ 3. End of Life Care Planning |
Patient State/Vitals | ||||||
Rhythm: Sinus, wide complex | HR: 72 (↓) | BP: 60/40 (↓) | RR: 10 (↓) | |||
O2SAT: 82% (↓) | T: 35.1oC | GCS: 12 |
S |
Setting Up |
|
|
P |
Perception of condition/seriousness |
|
|
I |
Invitation from the patient to give information |
|
|
K |
Knowledge: giving medical facts |
|
|
E |
Explore emotions and empathize |
|
|
S |
Strategy and Summary |
|
|
Adapted From: Baile WF, Buckman R, Lenzi R, Glober G, Beale EA, Kudelka AP. SPIKES-A six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer. Oncologist 2000;5(4):302-311.
Empathetic Statements | Exploratory Questions | Validating Response |
“I can see how upsetting this is to you.” | “How do you mean?” | “I can understand how you felt that way.” |
“I can tell you weren't expecting to hear this.” | “Tell me more about it.” | “I guess anyone might have that same reaction.” |
“I know this is not good news for you.” | “Could you explain what you mean?” | “You were perfectly correct to think that way.” |
“I'm sorry to have to tell you this.” | “You said it frightened you?” | “Yes, your understanding of the reason for the tests is very good.” |
“This is very difficult for me also.” | “Could you tell me what you're worried about?” | “It appears that you've thought things through very well.” |
“I was also hoping for a better result.” | “Now, you said you were concerned about your children. Tell me more.” | “Many other patients have had a similar experience.” |
Source: Baile WF, Buckman R, Lenzi R, Glober G, Beale EA, Kudelka AP. SPIKES-A six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer. Oncologist 2000;5(4):302-311.
Patient State/Vitals | ||||||
Rhythm: Sinus, wide complex | HR: 72 | BP: 60/40 | RR: 10 | |||
O2SAT: 82% | T: 35.1oC | GCS: 12 |
Expected Learner Actions | Modifiers | Triggers |
---|---|---|
Agreement on plans |
No Modifiers for this Stage |
All actions completed⇒ Debrief |
Patient State/Vitals | ||||||
Rhythm: Sinus, wide complex | HR: 72 | BP: 60/40 | RR: 10 | |||
O2SAT: 82% | T: 35.1oC | GCS: 12 |
Choosing a Debrief Framework:
A good debrief has been identified in the literature as the most important part of a successful simulation experience. If you're a novice or inexperienced facilitator, use this table to help you choose which debrief framework you want to use, just tap the button on their name and you will be directed to the appropriate aids or scripts. While we recommend the PEARLS framework, take a look to see if there may be another that is a better fit for your situation.
|
|||||
Time |
Facilitator Level |
Prep Time |
Scenario Type |
Flexibility |
|
Moderate |
Novice |
Moderate |
Any |
High |
|
Short-Moderate |
Novice |
Low |
Short w/ Clear Objectives |
Low |
|
Moderate |
Novice |
Moderate |
Any, esp. Team-focused |
Moderate |
|
Very Short |
No experience |
None |
Any |
Low |
|
Short |
Novice |
Low |
Low number of non-technical skills |
Low |
|
Very Short |
No experience |
None |
Any |
Moderate |
|
Moderate-Long |
Novice |
Moderate |
Any |
Moderate |
(To learn more about this debriefing framework, visit our page on Debriefing resources)
If you need help with debriefing Crisis Resource Management skills, check out this infographic from Isaak & Stiegler: View Infographic
Phase |
Objective |
Task |
Sample Phrases |
||
1. Setting the Scene |
Create a safe context for learning |
State the goal of debriefing; articulate the basic assumption |
“Let’s spend X minutes debriefing. Our goal is to improve how we work together and care for our patients.” “Everyone here is intelligent and wants to improve”
|
||
2. Reactions |
Explore feelings |
Solicit initial reactions and emotions
|
“Any initial reactions?” “How are you feeling?” |
||
3. Description |
Clarify Facts |
Develop a shared understanding of the case |
“Can you please share a short summary of the case?” “What was the working diagnosis? Does everyone agree?”
|
||
4. Analysis |
Explore a variety of performance domains:
|
See bottom of guide for details on the analysis phase |
For each item to be debriefed: 1. Preview Statement: (to introduce topic)
2. Pick Analysis method + Analyze: (see below for more info on each method)
3. Mini Summary: (to summarize discussion of topic)
Phase Wrap-up: "Any outstanding issues or concerns before we start to close?" |
||
5. Application or Summary |
Identify take-aways |
Can be learner- or instructor-centered |
Learner-centered: “What are some takeaways from this discussion for our clinical practice?”
Instructor-centered: “The key learning points for the case were [insert learning points]”
|
||
Analysis Phase Details |
|||||
Choose an analysis approach (Different approaches can be used for different topics within the same analysis stage): |
|||||
Approach |
Objective |
Sample Phrases |
|||
Learner Self-Assessment
|
Promote reflection by asking learners to assess their own performance |
“What aspects were managed well and why?”
“What aspects do you want to change and why?”
|
|||
Focused Facilitation
|
Probe deeper on key aspects of performance, uncover mental frames guiding performance |
Use Advocacy-Inquiry Method Advocacy: "I saw [observation], I think [your point-of-view]” "I noticed [observation] I liked that/I was concerned..." Inquiry: “How do you see it? What were your thoughts at the time?” |
|||
Provide Information
|
Teach to close clear knowledge gaps as they emerge and provide directive feedback as needed |
“I noticed[behaviour]. Next time you may want to consider [suggested behaviour], because [rationale]” |
PDF from debrief2learn.org: Here
Visual Guide: debrief2learn.org
Alternative Script: Here
Originally Created by: Bajaj K, Meguerdichian M, Thoma B, Huang S, Eppich W, Cheng A. The PEARLS Healthcare Debriefing Tool. Acad Med. 2018, 93(2), 336.
(To learn more about this debriefing framework, visit our page on Debriefing resources)
If you need help with debriefing Crisis Resource Management skills, check out this infographic from Isaak & Stiegler: View Infographic
Phase |
Goal |
Actions |
Possible Scripts |
Gather (Listen)
25% |
|
|
How do you feel? |
|
How do you think it went? Can you tell me what happened? |
||
|
Can anyone add anything to that account? |
||
Analyze (Guide Reflection)
50% |
|
|
I noticed… |
|
I noticed…. What was the thought process behind…. When….happened, I saw….What do you think….. I saw…I think….How do you see it? |
||
|
Tell me more about… How did you feel about…. I understand, but tell me about X aspect of the scenario |
||
Summarize (Help gather Conclusions)
25%
|
|
|
What are two things that you thought were effective or went well? |
|
What do you think are some areas you/your team need to work on? |
||
|
In today’s session, we…. Going forward, we should…. |
References/Adapted From:
(To learn more about this debriefing framework, visit our page on Debriefing resources)
If you need help with debriefing Crisis Resource Management skills, check out this infographic from Isaak & Stiegler: View Infographic
Instructions:
Actions |
Gather |
Analyze |
Summarize |
Closed-loop communication
Clear Messages
Clear Roles
Knowing one’s limitations
Knowledge Sharing
Constructive Intervention
Reevaluation and Summarizing
Mutual Respect
|
Student Observations
Instructor Observations
|
Done Well
Needs Improvement
|
Student-led Summary
Instructor-led Summary
|
References/Adapted from:
(To learn more about this debriefing framework, visit our page on Debriefing resources)
If you need help with debriefing Crisis Resource Management skills, check out this infographic from Isaak & Stiegler: View Infographic
|
Set learning objectives |
After Case |
How did it go? Address Concerns Review learning points Plan ahead |
Framework from:
(To learn more about this debriefing framework, visit our page on Debriefing resources)
If you need help with debriefing Crisis Resource Management skills, check out this infographic from Isaak & Stiegler: View Infographic
Diamond Debrief: Sample Phrases |
Description |
“So what happened?...and then what happened next?”
Continue asking until confident that the details of the scenario have been raised by the learners
“Let’s not judge our performance now, let’s just focus on what happened” |
Transition |
“This scenario was designed to show…”
“Let’s address technical and clinical questions. What is the protocol for…?”
“How do we normally deal with this clinical situation?”
“Everyone ok with that?” |
Analysis |
“How did that make you feel?” To participants, then group “Why?” Then use silence
“How did you/they do that exactly?” “Why did you respond in that way? “ or “Why did you take that action?”
“It feels like…was an issue. Did it feel like that to you?” What I’m hearing from you is…is that correct?”
“This is part of…” (identify the non-technical skill/human factor) “We refer to that as a human factor or non-technical skill, which means…” |
Transition |
“So, what we’ve talked about in this scenario is…” “What have we agreed we could do?” |
Application |
“What other kinds of situations might you face that might be similar? How are they similar?”
“How might these skills we discussed play out in those situations?”
“What are you going to do differently in your practice going forward?” |
Underlying Principles |
Description |
Reinforce a safe learning environment. Situate the debrief in the shared and meaningful activity that occurred. Keep the focus dispassionate—discuss what happened but avoid focus on emotions. Listen for emotional responses but resist the temptation to discuss emotions. Make sure everyone shares the same understanding of what happened.
|
Transition |
Transition into analysis by clarifying any technical and clinical issues |
Analysis |
Spend most of your time in Analysis. Deconstruct behaviours into specific actions, and explore what happened in detail. Ask about affective responses and validate them. Analyze and interpret the activity by applying appropriate frameworks or lenses (such as non-technical skills, or the clinical context surrounding the scenario). Keep discussion positive, and avoid the temptation to focus on “strengths and weaknesses”. Reflect responses back, allowing participants to amend or augment. |
Transition |
Transition into Application by reinforcing learning. |
Application |
Focus on moving from the specifics of the scenario to the more general world of practice. Break behaviours down into specific actions. Explore the other kinds of situations that these might apply to. Ask what participants will do differently in their practice. |
Adapted From: Jaye P, Thomas L, Reedy G (2015). 'The Diamond': a structure for simulation debrief. The Clinical Teacher 12(1). 171-175. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/tct.12300
If you need help with debriefing Crisis Resource Management skills, check out this infographic from Isaak & Stiegler: View Infographic
Pluses:
Deltas:
Plus (+) |
Delta (∆) |
References:
((To learn more about this debriefing framework, visit our page on Debriefing resources)
If you need help with debriefing Crisis Resource Management skills, check out this infographic from Isaak & Stiegler: View Infographic
Phase |
Purpose |
Process |
Sample Phrases |
Reactions |
|
|
How are you feeling? What are some initial reactions to what just happened? So, in that scenario… |
Analysis |
|
1. Observe an event or result. Comment on the observation.
2. Advocate for your position |
I saw that… I think… I noticed that…To me…
I saw…I’m concerned that… |
3. Investigate basis for learner’s thinking that led to the observed event or result |
What do you think? Why do you think that happened? How do you see it? What was the thought process behind….? |
||
4. Close the gap through discussion and didactics |
I hear…. What would it take for you to do this next time? How could we do this differently next time? I think a few good ideas that came up were… I’d like to say a little bit about…from my experience/literature |
||
Summary |
|
|
What are some takeaways from today? What went well today? What would you do differently next time?
In today’s session, we…. Going forward, we should… |
Adapted from:
1. When having difficult conversations or breaking bad news, the SPIKES framework can be very helpful: